- There was a reference to business friendly climate -- less regulation and power costs. This is always good for business of course, but I didn't see the most important factor for starting a business, the cost of doing business. This is determined by many things like the cost of living (a business needs to acquire supplies and hopefully have employees who get paid). The cost of living also includes things like taxes where California has a high sales tax, income tax, DMV fees, property taxes [the rates are reasonable in the 1% range, however the overall costs of living driving the housing prices up and thus the property tax outlay is high]. There is already concern that federal income taxes are to high but when adding additional state only costs this reduces the competitive advantage of business.
- Why is the legislature just now realizing that business is moving or deciding on states other than California to do business ? This trend has been happening for many years and there have been some major job / employer losses, why did it take this long to see that there is something wrong. Of course, just pointing out that something is wrong doesn't address the issue so I am hoping something will come of this.
- It was interesting that Texas was selected to visit instead of Arizona and Nevada, both of which have enjoyed the increase in investments from being neighbor states to California.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Why California is losing jobs
I found it interesting to read about a trip by Gavin Newsom to Texas to talk about jobs for many reasons:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Great points Chris and it's nice to see people in state government interested in this topic. But reducing the cost of business might (gasp) reduce revenue for the State! That is just what is needed, but it may require a state bankruptcy to force Sacramento to take this topic seriously and think beyond their current "revenue increases" and "spending cuts".
I think the state (and likely the federal government as well) is on the top part of the revenue curve (i.e., lowering the tax rate will generate an increase in income (similar to a supply demand curve where lowering the price will generate less profit on a per widget basis but will generate more sales so the overall profit will increase).
I think it would be a good idea for all governments to realize they are in competition with other municipalities (or even other countries) based on services (schools, crime rates, natural resources, infrastructure ...) and try to reduce taxes and increase services using technology and innovation.
Post a Comment